Re: Proper-Physics FT (PhT?)

Just about the best cross between proper physics and playability is to
be
found in (TA DA!) the EFSB rules. It should have a bright yellow cover
and
be called "Vector Addition For Dummies".

Scott B. Jaqua
Systems Manager
Center Line Wheels, Inc.
http://www.centerlinewheels.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
--------------------------------------
Wheel application information provided by the sales department. If you
have
additional questions please call the sales department at (562) 921-9637.

-----Original Message-----
From: Niall Gilsenan <ngilsena@indigo.ie>
To: FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk <FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk>
Date: Wednesday, May 06, 1998 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Proper-Physics FT (PhT?)

>But good physics for 2D motion might be fun.  I think TNE
>>(Brilliant Lances/Battle Rider) came closest; you really had to work
the
>>vectors to get a good missile shot.
>>
>>Noah V. Doyle
>>
>>
>Two games I absolutely despised for their movement systems.  Perhaps
its my
>simple nature but I never could really get into games where the
movement
>systems were hard to grasp unless your mathematical ability was up to
scratch.
>
>About the most complex I ever wanted to deal with was the movement
system
>in Leviathan.	Ah well, each to their own.
>