Prev: DSII/SGII Tanker's wares Next: RE: How a minature should look

RE: How a minature should look

From: "Haun, Gilles - SSG" <haung@e...>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 08:39:51 -0500
Subject: RE: How a minature should look

Mikko -

>From what I've seen, material is usually part of the cost of the
product's production.

Gil
 Murphy's Laws of Combat #5
>"A sucking chest wound is nature's way of telling you to slow down!"

>----------
>From:	Mikko Kurki-Suonio[SMTP:maxxon@swob.dna.fi]
>Sent:	Monday, December 22, 1997 4:23 PM
>To:	FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
>Subject:	Re: How a minature should look
>
>On 22 Dec 1997, David Maslen wrote:
><snipped>
>Metal miniatures can be produced every bit as clean and detailed as 
>plastic ones. It's a question of scale and cost, not material.
>
>-- 
>maxxon@swob.dna.fi (Mikko Kurki-Suonio)	   | A pig who doesn't
fly
>+358 50 5596411 GSM +358 9 80926 78/FAX 81/Voice  | is just an ordinary
pig.
>Maininkitie 8A8 02320 ESPOO FINLAND | Hate me?    |	      - Porco
Rosso
>http://www.swob.dna.fi/~maxxon/     | hateme.html |
>
>


Prev: DSII/SGII Tanker's wares Next: RE: How a minature should look