Prev: Re: [OFFICIAL] Where we're going from here...[LONG RAMBLE!!] Next: Re: Changing Die Types

Re: Changing Die Types

From: Donald Hosford <Hosford.donald@a...>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 20:44:19 -0400
Subject: Re: Changing Die Types

Earl R. Forsythe II wrote:
> 
> Message text written by INTERNET:FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk
> >
> That having been said, you might be better off using d12s. A d12 is
simple
> to convert from a d6 (just double the numbers and round; a "6" to hit
on a
> d6 becomes an "11" or "12" to hit on a d12) and you still have room to
add
> die mods.
> <
> 
> D12s are a particuarly nice choice, as you can just use the number of
> screens on the target as a negative modifier to the roll and the
> probability
> curve is fairly close to the produced by the shield rules in the book.
> (level  3 shields are not quite as effective under this, but based on
what
> I've seen, that's more of a feature than a bug.)
> 
> Ray

You could always allow level 4+ shields in your 1d12 games...  I assume
you are refering to the unshielded table?

Donald Hosford

Prev: Re: [OFFICIAL] Where we're going from here...[LONG RAMBLE!!] Next: Re: Changing Die Types