Prev: Re: FTL capable fighters (B5) Next: FT-Carrier after market add-ons..

Re: Honor Harrington

From: "Rutherford, Michael" <MRutherf@n...>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 02:09:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Honor Harrington

><< Another alternative would be to define 10" as energy range
> and 100" as missile range.  You'd still need a large table
> to play a game of HH Full Thrust.  >>
>
>why not break this up into a long range missle combat setup, 50" range,
>representing 1,000,000 km, or 20,000 km/inch) for beginning missile
salvos
>and 30 sec. per turn (would allow 1 salvo per turn), and then when
ships are
>close enough, 20" or so, change the scale to represent 400,000 km by
moving
>the ships out to 40", 10,000 km/inch, range and 5 seconds per turn to
allow
>energy weapons to fire once per turn and missile once per 6 turns.

Interesting idea but wouldn't there be a problem if the opposing fleets
don't stay together ie half the fleet at missile range and the other
half at energy range.

Michael "Wargh" Rutherfurd

Prev: Re: FTL capable fighters (B5) Next: FT-Carrier after market add-ons..