Re: Fw: Weapons for Newtonian based FTIII
From: Chun Wang <cwang@d...>
Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 12:14:33 -0400
Subject: Re: Fw: Weapons for Newtonian based FTIII
On Mon, 5 May 1997, Mikko Kurki-Suonio wrote:
> But they don't. That's the problem. You could have a station with
> zillions of guns and screens and armor and it still wouldn't matter if
I
> could just stop 1" outside your effective range and nibble you to
death.
>
> And that's exactly what you can do with missiles: Arrive 60" away from
the
> station, conveniently outside the range of all weapons except
missiles,
> launch, turn away, reload, come back to 60", launch...
>
> The only thing, apart from calling help and surrendering, the station
can
> do is to hope he has such a mass of PDAFs that he can drop more
missiles
> on average than the enemy can launch in one salvo.
>
> Jump point -style FTL does give fortresses a bit more edge, because it
> limits the number of possible approaches.
*SIGH* Space stations are neccesarry not as an offence weapon,
but
it real purpose should be repair and build ships. It's much effective to
build a ship in space then on the planet side.
So... let's apply what you said to planets... Mmmm... planet
cannot
move... so we track a hugh asteriod to drop on the planets.... we should
get the same effect as nuclear winter or ice age on earth(If I am wrong
feel free to correct me.). Therefor, planet is not really defendable
either... (I think some body else mentioned drop a hugh rock on planets
too.)
The point I want to make is, if you REALLY want to destroy
something
badly, YOU CAN!!! The problem is why, and what benefit do you gain? In
case of droping a asteroid on a planet, you will almost render the
planet
inhabitable. Congratulation you gain a rock that is usless to you. In
case of dead space station, you cannot repair your ship with enemy's
equitment. I just think destroy a space station wouldn't benefit as much
as capture it.
Thanks for listening to my rambling...
************************************************************************
*
*"To be or not to be that is the question."
*
*To be is infinite better then to be in the limbo flowing around...
*
*So..... Get a life... :)
*
*Chun-Kai Wang a.k.a. Kevin, Zelt, and Zilvra Argith
*
************************************************************************
*