Re: Vector movement - Reply
From: Phillip Atcliffe <P-ATCLIFFE@w...>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 06:29:47 -0500
Subject: Re: Vector movement - Reply
Oerjan wrote (and he's probably about to wish that he hadn't...):
> It is far more difficult to figure out where you're going to end
> up with the "old" FT rules, and (at least for me :/ )
> neigh on impossible to get to where I want to be <g>
^^^^^
Does this mean that you think the old rules need a bit more horsepower?
<grin, run, duck for cover...>
Phil, who couldn't resist it (but probably should have...)
-------------------------------------------------------------
"I think... I think I am! | I think _I_ am:
Therefore I am... I think..?" | Phil Atcliffe
-- The Moody Blues | (p-atclif@uwe.ac.uk)