Prev: Re: A complete turn-around of attitude...(david has nailed the issue) Next: Re: EMP was Why big ships are too good...

Re: Construction times

From: rpaul@w... (Robin Paul)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 07:28:16 -0500
Subject: Re: Construction times

	As we've been talking about steel wet-navy construction times as
a
way to get a handle on FT build times, I looked up Napoleonic wooden
ship
construction in "Nelson's Navy" by Brian Lavery.  
	He says that a sloop (~20 guns) could be built in 6 months, a
74-gun
Ship of the Line (i.e. a standard Battleship) typically took 2 and a 1/2
years, and a First rate (i.e. a Superdreadnought) could easily take 10
years.	Costs per ton rose as ship size rose, as bigger ships needed
bigger,
better more expensive timbers for critical components (She's a BIG ship,
she
has BIG futtocks...!).	In 1804, a private shipyard had 35 shipwrights
while
building 2 ships of the line (presumably 74s) - that doesn't include
labourers.

	It's intriguing that the times are quite similar to those for
late
steel warships;  The UK around 1800 was to the construction of wooden
warships what the US was to the construction of WW2 ships- ie with a
mature
technology and a powerful industrial base to support it.

	Two other points in passing;  the Admiralty had ships designed
according to a fairly fixed protocol, with all the original plans done
to
1/48th scale...  Also, there was a formula for calculating the "tonnage"
-
this took no account of hull form, and therefore had little or no
bearing on
the true displacement, but it WAS useful as an indication of the time,
expense and materials needed for a particular ship, and was the
registered
tonnage on the Navy List.  The formula was:

	("Length on the Gundeck" x "Breadth" x "Half the Breadth")/94

cheers,
Rob Paul

Rob Paul
NERC Institute of Virology 
Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SR	  Tel. (01865) 512361
rkp@mail.nerc-oxford.ac.uk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  "Once again, villainy is rotting meat before the maggots of justice!"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

Prev: Re: A complete turn-around of attitude...(david has nailed the issue) Next: Re: EMP was Why big ships are too good...