Re: What makes a carrier, a carrier?

pcaron%nhqvax.dnet@rapnet.sanders.lockheed.com wrote:

>	Ages ago, there was some talk about the dividing line between
> a carrier and a non-carrier.	I believe it compared the MASS of the 
> fighter bays vs. something else.  I need to know so I can update my
> gaming groups "House Rules".	Anyone remember what the "accepted"
> carrier classification is?

I don't think we reached any kind of consensus: 
	 I like bay mass >= 50% available mass
	 someone suggested bay mass >= 2*weapon mass
	 (there might have been a few other suggestions)

    Alun.
    ~~~~