Prev: Re: Gen Con '97 Next: Re: hyperspace (was: cloaking device rules)

Re: Multifunction fighters

From: JAMES BUTLER <JAMESBUTLER@w...>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 14:28:45 -0400
Subject: Re: Multifunction fighters

At 04:56 PM 8/16/96 +0000, you wrote:
>I've been playing with some numbers to try and knock together a
modified
>fighter construction system for FT/MT along the lines of Steve Gibson's
>rules fore infantry in DS2.
>
>Table 1: Anti-fighter effectiveness
>Level			 Effect 			Points
>None	       NO *AF or dogfight rolls 		  0
>Standard      standard *AF and dogfight rolls		  1
>Interceptor   +1 on*AF or dogfight rolls		  3
>
>Rob Paul
>NERC Institute of Virology 
>Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SR    Tel. (01865) 512361
>rkp@mail.nerc-oxford.ac.uk
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>			  "Auld an' bald!"
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>
>

	This system is extremely cool. But how would you simulate the
reduced anti-fighter effectiveness of attack and torpedo fighters? If
memory
serves, they still have an anti-fighter attack but they kill fighters
only
on a 6. 

	James
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

		___
	       |[|]|
	       |[|]|
	      /|[|]|\	_______  __	//    //
      _ _   /==|[|]|==\(_______)/  \__[__]__[__]__MMMMMMMMMM\
     [_|_|\%%===[|]====(_______)|  |===================HHHHHH\
     [_|_| %%===[|]====(_______)|  |=X=X=X==X=X=X======HHHHHHH]
     [_|_| %%==========(_______)\__/ }C=K@	  WWWWWWWWWW/
     [_|_|/
					    }C=K@
     |_____||__________||_________||____________||___________|
      Main    Bridge/	   Fuel/      Weapons/	   Scanners/
      Drive   Quarters	Jump Drive  Ship's Boats Spinal Mount

	Battlecruiser INTREPID, CORMORANT-class
	Captain James L. Butler III, Commanding
	JAMESBUTLER@worldnet.att.net

Prev: Re: Gen Con '97 Next: Re: hyperspace (was: cloaking device rules)