RE: brief Fall In convention AAR

Oh, sure, I shift attention for a couple of hours, and miss a perfectly
good chance to get all hostile about the fact I can’t express myself.
;->=

Thanks, Roger, and no problem, Indy. As I indicated, sounded rather
silly to me.

Doug

From: Gzg [mailto:gzg-bounces@firedrake.org] On Behalf Of Indy
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 4:53 AM
To: gzg@firedrake.org
Subject: Re: brief Fall In convention AAR

Ahhh, I misunderstood.	:-)
Mk

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Roger Bell_West
<roger@firedrake.org<mailto:roger@firedrake.org>> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:49:43AM -0500, Indy wrote:
>Not sure what you mean by combo weapon/firecon pointing? IF I
understand
>what you are saying, you can already do that. The limitation on
firecons is
>the number of targets you can track/bring weapons to bear upon, not the
>number of weapons you can fire in a given turn?

I assumed the suggestion was to roll (some fraction of) the cost of
firecons into the cost of weapons - i.e. each gun functionally has its
own firecon and can therefore fire at anything it likes.