Re: SG:AC discussions (was: Official - More re GZG news update - NEW RELEASES!)
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:27:54 +0100
Subject: Re: SG:AC discussions (was: Official - More re GZG news update - NEW RELEASES!)
>textfilter: chose text/plain from a multipart/alternative
>
>On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Ground Zero Games <jon@gzg.com> wrote:
>
>> >On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:17:02AM +0100, Ground Zero Games wrote:
>> >>
>>
>> >
>> >>Interesting, and yes, I can understand the reasoning behind this;
>> >>that is how most soldiers survive to reach Veteran status after
>> >>all....
>> >>It CAN be handled by a combination of motivation and confidence
>> >>levels along with the troop quality stats, but this merits much
more
>> >>discussion!
>> >
>> >As a role-player, I'm willing to compromise: the on-scene commander
>> >(my avatar on the battlefield) should do just what I tell him to
do,
>> >but the blokes he's commanding should be at liberty to say "could I
>> >have that in writing, sir?" (and similar phrases that should chill
the
>> >heart of any competent officer).
>>
>>
>> Yes, I think that's exactly the sort of feel that we should be
aiming
>> for. The kind of player who wants 100% perfect control over every
>> figure in his army is most probably already lost to us anyway, and I
>> don't see much point in compromising the game just to suit that type
>> of player.
>>
>> Perhaps the most important thing as a first step is to actually
>> define the target players for the game - if anyone wants to chime in
>> with some thoughts on that, feel free!
>>
>
>By "target players", do you mean those who will be playing the game, or
>those we will be shooting at?
>
>Mk
How did I know that someone would ask that....? ;-)
Jon (GZG)