Prev: RE: Naval FT Variant Next: Re: Macross/Robotech minis? Re: GZG ECC 16 - an overview wrap

Re: Naval FT Variant

From: Binhan Lin <binhan.lin@g...>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 10:35:07 -0600
Subject: Re: Naval FT Variant

textfilter: chose text/plain from a multipart/alternative

Yes, same things. The problem was Wet Thrust had some non-gaming
connotations ;) So keeping with the Full Thrust meaning, I used Flank
Speed.

-Binhan

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Douglas Evans <devans@nebraska.edu>
wrote:

> So, in some discussions I came across whilst applying Google-fu to the
> problem, I saw that Flank Speed was also referred to as 'Wet Thrust'.
>
> At some point, same beast?
>
> Doug
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Binhan Lin [mailto:binhan.lin@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 12:09 PM
> To: gzg@firedrake.org
> Subject: Re: Naval FT Variant
>
> I did the original Flank Speed conversions, but I no longer have a
copy
> and only a faint memory of the conversions stats. For weapons there
was
> something about large caliber (12" or up) and a combination of number
in a
> turret to generate the A-bats (class 1's), 8" to 11.9" were B-bat's
(class
> 2's) and less than 8" for the C-bat's (class 3). Also if the 5" were
DP,
> then they could also be used for anti-fighter.  Torpedoes are
torpedoes.
> Belt armor translated into armor and top speed into top speed.
>
> Pretty much you'd have to build it from scratch now.
>
> -Binhan
>
>
>
>
>
>

Prev: RE: Naval FT Variant Next: Re: Macross/Robotech minis? Re: GZG ECC 16 - an overview wrap