Prev: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters... Next: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters...

RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters...

From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:50:35 +0100
Subject: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters...

>  On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:36:09 +0100, Ground Zero Games <jon@gzg.com>
>  wrote:
>>  The use of the term "free shot" is, in hindsight, a little
misleading
>>  - what I was attempting to convey was not an ADDITIONAL attack, but
a
>>  volley of shots without risk of return fire - if one player moves
>>  into dogfight contact with an enemy group (or if resolving an
ongoing
>>  dogfight from a previous turn), and that enemy decides not to hang
>>  around and engage in the dogfight then the attacking group gets to
>>  fire at them anyway as they disengage - with the disengaging group
>>  NOT being able to shoot back (they are pointing the wrong way and
>>  pouring on the thrust!).
>
>  And if you're in a Starfury, pointing the right way and pouring on
>  the thrust?

There always has to be one......  ;-)

Jon (GZG)

>
>--
>  Be seeing you,
>  Sam.

Prev: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters... Next: RE: [FT] Yet another question about fighters...