Prev: Re: [GZG] FMAS: Combining Movement with Shooting Next: Re: [GZG] Gzg-l Digest, Vol 35, Issue 9

Re: [GZG] Gzg-l Digest, Vol 35, Issue 9

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@g...>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 23:44:07 +0430
Subject: Re: [GZG] Gzg-l Digest, Vol 35, Issue 9

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:30 PM,  <gzg-l-request@mail.csua.berkeley.edu>
wrote:

> So are takeing into consideration say smartgun links, eg point the dot
in the helmet hud at the target.
> I dont think you can say that because you cant run and fire with
current weapons doesnt mean you
> wont be able too with future personnel weapons.
>
> How much kick would a laser or emp gun have.

You've never actually fired a weapon, have you?

When you run, you are moving up and down--and tiny variations in the
position of the muzzle translate into large deviations in the position
of the bullet 100m downrange.

You can run and fire with lots of weapons, but you aren't going to hit
shit except by accident.

John
who believes suppression is the consolation prize for missing the
enemy with your aimed fire, not an end goal in and of itself.
-- 
"Thousands of Sarmatians, Thousands of Franks, we've slain them again
and again.  We're looking for thousands of Persians."
--Vita Aureliani
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu
http://mail.csua.berkeley.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] FMAS: Combining Movement with Shooting Next: Re: [GZG] Gzg-l Digest, Vol 35, Issue 9