Prev: Re: [GZG] Mixed Role Fighters Next: Re: [GZG] Mixed Role Fighters

Re: [GZG] Mixed Role Fighters

From: Charles Lee <xarcht@y...>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [GZG] Mixed Role Fighters

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lI
keep hearing every argument except one. Jack of all trades, master of
none. This was true ferever and still true today.

--- On Thu, 4/16/09, James Butler <jlbutler3@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: James Butler <jlbutler3@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [GZG] Mixed Role Fighters
To: gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
Date: Thursday, April 16, 2009, 7:02 PM

>The only thing that would stop me from using them would be expense; if
I
>were modelling the Masters of the Hierarchy with their near-Munchkin
>fighters I'd go with heavy interceptors swinging or mixing to heavy 

     Just out of curiosity, would that be the Ur-Quan Hierarchy and its
army of
Battle Thralls and if so, do you have stats?

     Thanks,

     James!



_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l



Prev: Re: [GZG] Mixed Role Fighters Next: Re: [GZG] Mixed Role Fighters