Re: [GZG] [ECC XII][For Damo] Thoughts on stress for FMAS - somefeedback

Damo,

I did not put the <irony> tag around my comment but it was meant to be
there.	As we both say, the skirmish game leads to other levels of games
and if folks are already playing an FMA style game they will be apt to
look at another.

Is the one holding FMA on this list?  I would like to see where it is
and help move it forward as I have finally stabilized in a location (for
a while at least <G>)

Bob Makowsky

----- Original Message ----
From: Damo <damosan@gmail.com>
To: gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2009 8:57:49 PM
Subject: Re: [GZG] [ECC XII][For Damo] Thoughts on stress for FMAS -
somefeedback

On Mar 4, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Robert Makowsky wrote:
>
> That is true - the payoff being small.
>

Small payoff?  There are a number of companies that did just fine  
with a skirmish set.  I'm sure there are a number of Gateway  
metaphors to use with FMAS leading to SG2 (or 3) and to Jon's recent  
posts about his current rules development meanderings.

The 10 year anniversary of FMAS is coming up this July.  It'd be nice  
to see it completed.

Damo

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l