Prev: [GZG] QUESTION: are SAWs becoming less significant...? Next: Re: [GZG] UN Recruiting Video

Re: [GZG] QUESTION: are SAWs becoming less significant...?

From: Damo <damosan@g...>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:05:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] QUESTION: are SAWs becoming less significant...?


On Jan 31, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Ground Zero Games wrote:
>
> Do SAWs become less significant in terms of the overall firepower of
> a squad or fireteam, as the tech level of the individual soldiers'
> weapons increases?

I'd say no.  Perhaps the name changes from SAW (Sq. Auto. Weapon) to  
SSW (Sq. SUPPORT Wpn) but I'd think the infantry squad will always  
have something special to anchor their tactics around.

This may not be the case for non-infantry or specialized troops who  
only have their standard issue rifle.  Having said that back in my  
Arty days we actually had quite a few M-60s and M-203s.  203s I could  
understand but 60's?  I mean really now -- we had at least thirteen . 
50's spread throughout the battery...  Oh well.

D.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: [GZG] QUESTION: are SAWs becoming less significant...? Next: Re: [GZG] UN Recruiting Video