Prev: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality.... Next: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality....

Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality....

From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@s...>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:00:29 -0800
Subject: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality....


On Dec 13, 2008, at 6:41 PM, John Atkinson wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Michael Llaneza
<maserati@speakeasy.net 
> > wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2008, at 5:37 PM, John Atkinson wrote:
>>>> Jon is discussing tactical implications of small arms.  You're  
>>>> asking
>>> political and strategic questions.	The outcome of every single
>>> firefight in Vietnam was favorable to the United States--but in the
>>> long run, that wasn't the relevant question.  Or rather, it wasn't
>>> relevant enough.
>
>> Ok, now I want to see a GZG strategic game with all the soft factors
>> the rest of the genre avoids.
>
> Sure thing.  And the second Jon can find customers who are enthralled
> by the idea of doing SWEAT-MS assessments, he'll put in the effort to
> write the rules.

What's the FM for those ? I should at least do some background reading.

--
Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1951

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality.... Next: Re: [GZG] Question: small-arms tech and troop quality....