Prev: Re: [GZG] gross counting was weights Next: Re: [GZG] Slightly OT - Hypothetical weapon question

Re: [GZG] Slightly OT - Hypothetical weapon question

From: "Ryan Fisk" <ryan.fisk@g...>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:05:41 -0600
Subject: Re: [GZG] Slightly OT - Hypothetical weapon question

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Ryan Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com>
wrote:
> At 4:01 PM -0600 10/28/08, Ryan Fisk wrote:

>>In the Mythbusters episode that was mentioned they found that .50 cal
>>round pretty much disintegrated into nothing when shot into the water.
>>  That .50 cal, based on that data, may not be able to put a hole in
>>the boat very much below the water line (a few inches at most).
>
> What were they firing? AP is not going to
> disintegrate. Don't base your ballistics
> knowledge on Mythbusters. They're NOT very expert
> on Ballistics.

No argument there.  They don't have a clue, but the footage they shot
was very convincing.  I would have NEVER expected the result as seen
on camera.

As for AP, I have no idea.

When it comes to ballistics, I go with this book:

http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Firearm-Ballistics-Robert-Rinker/dp/
0964559846

It's not very scientific, but I shoot the crap out of stuff in my back
yard too.  I live in rural Wyoming, I have tons of back yard.

-- 
Ryan Fisk

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] gross counting was weights Next: Re: [GZG] Slightly OT - Hypothetical weapon question