Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:16:16 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?
> >I work at Carnegie Mellon. About 6 months ago, I got in touch with a
>>buddy who's a sys admin at the robotics consortium. I took my 12 year
>>old son to see the Crusher and it's predecessors, among other robotic
>>delights It's even cooler than it looks. :)
>>
>>J
>
>
>Interesting article, but no pics that I could see.... anyone have any
>direct links to some pics of this?
>
>Jon (GZG)
>
>==========================
>
>Try here....
>
>http://www.rec.ri.cmu.edu/projects/crusher/
>
>They even have a brochure. :-)
Thanks for that! :-)
Jon (GZG)
>
>>>>
>>>> Interesting item I just ran across. may be old news. A vehicle
>>> that is "state-of-the-art in autonomous unmanned ground vehicles
>>> systems.â¤
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fred
>>>>
>>>> http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=8962
>>>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gzg-l mailing list
>Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
>http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l