Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?
From: "Hudak, Michael" <mihudak@s...>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:34:26 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?
>I work at Carnegie Mellon. About 6 months ago, I got in touch with a
>buddy who's a sys admin at the robotics consortium. I took my 12 year
>old son to see the Crusher and it's predecessors, among other robotic
>delights It's even cooler than it looks. :)
>
>J
Interesting article, but no pics that I could see.... anyone have any
direct links to some pics of this?
Jon (GZG)
==========================
Try here....
http://www.rec.ri.cmu.edu/projects/crusher/
They even have a brochure. :-)
>>>
>>> Interesting item I just ran across. may be old news. A vehicle
>> that is "state-of-the-art in autonomous unmanned ground vehicles
>> systems.â¤
>>>
>>>
>>> Fred
>>>
>>> http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=8962
>>>
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l