Prev: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre? Next: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?

From: "Hudak, Michael" <mihudak@s...>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:34:26 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?



>I work at Carnegie Mellon. About 6 months ago, I got in touch with a
>buddy who's a sys admin at the robotics consortium.  I took my 12 year
>old son to see the Crusher and it's predecessors, among other robotic
>delights  It's even cooler than it looks. :)
>
>J

Interesting article, but no pics that I could see.... anyone have any
direct links to some pics of this?

Jon (GZG)

==========================

Try here....

http://www.rec.ri.cmu.edu/projects/crusher/

They even have a brochure.  :-)

>>>
>>>  Interesting item I just ran across. may be old news. A vehicle
>>  that is "state-of-the-art in autonomous unmanned ground vehicles
>>  systems.â¤
>>>
>>>
>>>  Fred
>>>
>>>  http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=8962
>>>

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre? Next: Re: [GZG] FW: [twohourwargames] Re: Why didn' t they call this an Ogre?