Prev: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS Next: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS

Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS

From: "Tom B" <kaladorn@g...>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:09:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lWhe
re possible, even irregular forces (insurgents, freedom fighters,
partisans, or resistance fighters... whatever) will use standard
munitions.
I mean, if they can get and deploy real mines, no need to make an IED.
That
makes perfect sense. The IED is the domain of those who have limited
options.

That said:

If I take a big old-school (say 20 years out of date) anti-tank mine and
graft on a new triggering mechanism (say vibrations sensor vs. pressure
plate), does that make it an IED, even though it really was once a
manufactured mine?

And I keep hearing about more effective bombs (or components of, or
expertise to make same) being smuggled into the hot zones from places
outside (Iran is mentioned a lot). The implication of the reporting is
that
these are sophisticated devices that are not the province of backyard
chemists. Are these considered actual mines? Or are they still an IED,
just
using better shaped charges and so forth?

T.

-- 
"Now, I go to spread happiness to the rest of the station. It is a
terrible
responsibility but I have learned to live with it."
Londo, A Voice in the Wilderness, Part I

"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like
administering medicine to the dead." -- Thomas Paine

Thomas Paine


Prev: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS Next: Re: [GZG] Armoured utility vehicles and IEDs in SG/DS