Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

From: "Michael" <mwsaber6@m...>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:05:31 -0600
Subject: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lPow
er projection is ALWAYS shaped by shipping, be it foot, rail or
watercraft.  The US kept making Shermans because "they fit" in the
transports. 

Michael Brown
mwsaber6@msn

From: Don M 
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:01 AM
To: gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu 
Subject: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised
forces?

Even taking into account futuristic materials, MBTs are likely going to
be used sparingly in a colonial space setting and likely reserved for
homeworld and major colony forces where they can be produced on site.
You may have them available for trans-stellar transport, but this would
be used sparingly as effective MBTs are likely to still pose a supply
issue even if they are fuelled by amazing fusion bottles with
operational lives of a thousand years or whatever.

-Eli

Spot on................)

Don

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?