Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

From: Adrian1 <al.ll@t...>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:12:14 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?

Ryan Gill wrote:
> There's a rather interesting thread a while back 
> over on Tank net about the Chieftan Assault Gun 
> proposal that was done. Nothing more than a 
> mockup, but the proposed armament was 
> astonishing. A 110mm or 120mm in the 1970s.
> Here's the thread...
> http://63.99.108.76/forums/index.php?showtopic=24864&hl=centurion
>
>   
That looks disturbingly like something out of WH40K.

I never got the point of assault guns.	If a guns main purpose is to 
fire at rapidly moving targets then this is possibly the worst ever
design.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l


Prev: Re: [GZG] Subject: Re: What are the pitfalls of standardised forces? Next: Re: [GZG] What are the pitfalls of standardised forces?