Re: [GZG] theoretical rules schedule? (was Re: And now for something completely different...)
From: paul@o...
Date: 11 Jul 2008 15:32:55 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] theoretical rules schedule? (was Re: And now for something completely different...)
Ground Zero Games <jon@gzg.com> wrote:
> OK, I know this was tongue-in-cheek, but I'm going to answer it
> seriously! ;-)
>
> BDS will not happen in it's originally planned form. As you know, it
> was intended to be a supplement for SGII, but it just got overtaken
> by events and other projects. However, the name is too good not to
> use - so it may eventually see the light as a supplement for SG:AC
> instead.... :-)
Heh, thanks for the reply. It was meant as a joke. But, since we've come
this far, let's keep the ball rolling: what rules-projects are being
worked
on, what rules-projects are back-burnered for now, and which previous
projects are no longer happening, for one reason or another?
-p.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l