Re: [GZG] Artillery considerations

I like the idea of abstract off-table assets rather than trying to
quantify them too specifically. SG's approach is good in my opinion.
Ideally, you want the rules to center around what's going on on-table,
with minimal distractions from off-table complications.

On 7/9/08, David Rodemaker <dar@horusinc.com> wrote:
> I really have to say that I like the idea of artillery being
abstracted like
> aerospace support. I like the idea even more of being able to degrade
it in
> various ways if you want to spend the points to try and do it -
essentially
> a minigame (or extra layer of tactics/strategy if you prefer).

-- 
Robert Mayberry

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l