Re: [GZG] FTverse colinies

John Atkinson wrote:

> >> > On another line, I do not believe in the "elite myth"... I think
our
> >> > experiences show that high quality forces (with both training and
> >> > material superiority) rule the battlefield, but are very limited
when
> >> > things move to the "asymmetrical" war... want to destroy a
planet's
> >> > power grid? Having local aerospace superiority is all you need!
But
> >> > if you want to occupy for any time the main population centers
> >> > against a motivated opposition, you'll need far more than SAS or
> >> > Delta Force or a few companies of powersuited infantry, or
they'll
> >> > bleed to death through thousands small attacks from unarmored,
> >> > untrained militians, IMO.
> >>
> >>Cite an instance.
> >
> > Cite an instance where elite SF types - which is what Enzo was
talking
> > above above - *by themselves* won a campaign, without any backup
from far
> > more numerous "normal" ground forces or local militias.
>
>He being extremely vague in how he phrases, but I didn't take it as
>"SF types" alone,

I think his examples "SAS, Delta Force or a few companies of powersuited

infantry" were pretty clear: extremely competent, but also very small.
He's 
talking about forces up to *a few companies* in size; in your 
counter-example you talk about your *brigade*. There's a slight
difference 
in scale between a brigade and a few companies :-/

Considering that he started his post by noting that the high-quality
forces 
"rule the battlefield", I really don't think that he intended to dismiss

those very same high-quality forces as "worthless" :-/

Regards,

Oerjan
orjan.ariander1@comhem.se

"Life is like a sewer.
  What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it."
-Hen3ry

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu
http://vermouth.csua.berkeley.edu:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l