Prev: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if? Next: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

From: emu2020@c...
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:40:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lYou
also have to establish limits in a particular rules system.  I mean,
this could be drawn out into every crazy sci-fi direction such as we
need rules for aliens who have transcended the phsycial form and exist
as being of pure energy. Um...no we don't.  Sure one player in a
thousand might want to play such a race, but do you write it into the
rules?

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Damo <damosan@gmail.com> 

> 
> On Feb 10, 2008, at 8:51 AM, John Atkinson wrote: 
> 
> > 
> > Nanites have been discussed to death on this list. 
> > 
> > Eventually the discussion runs down to this, every single time: 
> > 
> > 
> 
> [snip] 
> 
> I hear ya. I think it's an exercise in restraint myself -- just 
> because you can EVENTUALLY end at a particular point doesn't mean you 
> have to game AT that point in time. 
> 
> But having said that I guess a common theme is we should ignore every 
> possibly fun scifi development because some power-gamer of the future 
> will abuse it. It's almost like you shouldn't even bother discussing 
> *anything* because 200 messages later someone will say "two blobs 
> converge on each other and that isn't fun." 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Gzg-l mailing list 
> Gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU 
> http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l 

Prev: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if? Next: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?