Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?
From: emu2020@c...
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:40:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question: was Re: [SG3]: What if?
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lYou
also have to establish limits in a particular rules system. I mean,
this could be drawn out into every crazy sci-fi direction such as we
need rules for aliens who have transcended the phsycial form and exist
as being of pure energy. Um...no we don't. Sure one player in a
thousand might want to play such a race, but do you write it into the
rules?
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Damo <damosan@gmail.com>
>
> On Feb 10, 2008, at 8:51 AM, John Atkinson wrote:
>
> >
> > Nanites have been discussed to death on this list.
> >
> > Eventually the discussion runs down to this, every single time:
> >
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> I hear ya. I think it's an exercise in restraint myself -- just
> because you can EVENTUALLY end at a particular point doesn't mean you
> have to game AT that point in time.
>
> But having said that I guess a common theme is we should ignore every
> possibly fun scifi development because some power-gamer of the future
> will abuse it. It's almost like you shouldn't even bother discussing
> *anything* because 200 messages later someone will say "two blobs
> converge on each other and that isn't fun."
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
> http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l