Re: [GZG] Opposed roll randomness (Was: [SG3]: What if?)
From: "Owen Glover" <oglover@b...>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:01:57 +1100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Opposed roll randomness (Was: [SG3]: What if?)
Chipping in my 2 cents worth...
I've toyed with the idea of using something like what is used in WRG
ancients (now Warrior) of using "regular" dice; d6 is 2,3,3,4,4,5
instead of 1-6. The Regular troops are less likely to do bad.
Untrained; d4 remains the same as probably Green d6, however for the
rest, for example d8 becomes 2,3,4,4,5,5,6,7 alternately you roll 2 d4s
and add the score.
Both approaches have difficulties; re-painting all your d8, d10 and d12
dice but keeping a second unchanged set for Firepower. For the other, it
will likely slow things down somewhat with separate rolls of Quality
dice.....
Cheers,
Owen
> -----Original Message-----
> [mailto:gzg-l-bounces@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Samuel Penn
> >> A bad roll from good troops can result in the other
> side's roll being almost meaningless - they're going to win.
>
> Your example is fine - the greens did very well, and the
> elites did very badly. It's when the greens roll a 2 and
> still win that it seems wrong.
>
> Having said that, I think the SG mechanic does work well, and
> I haven't come up with a way of improving it without
> complicating things. My complaint is a theoretical one based
> on how I like mechanics to work.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
http://mead.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU:1337/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l