RE: [GZG]FirstlookatnewNSLships!:-) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

I have to agree with Brendan.  I would reduce the beam 4s and 3s to 3
arc, and put more on.  Each "side" can do the F, F[S/P], and R[S/P]
side.  It'll have good broadsides and will horrific to the front. :)

J

> Big mean and nasty.  From a background perspective, what is the
reasoning
> for the 5-arc Beam-3s and Beam-4s? Smaller arcs (max 3-arc) and more
> weapon mounts give greater "bang" for the same mass.	Personally it
isn't
> dangerous enough in close to discourage swarm ships or close
maneouvring
> to get in its blind spot.
> 
> Also, I think the 3-row hull is overkill on a ship this large
(although 
> does fit the fluff you wrote) and the cost increase is quite
significant 
> for an NSL ship.
> 
> 
> Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/
> 
>> -----Original Message----- James Moore Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007
>> 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [GZG] First look at new NSL ships! :-)
>> 
>> (Insert Class Name Here (Bismarck???)) Class Superdreadnought
>> 
>> The ships follow standard NSL design doctrine in carrying no screens,
>> but they mount a significant amount of armor over an incredibly
strong
>> hull. Additionally, these vessels are among the first NSL warships to
>> feature the Schwerpunkt internal compartmentalization system, which
>> features enhanced bulkheads and fire suppression systems to protect
>> vital systems and keep the ship in the fight longer.
>> 
>> Here's a link to the SSD (I hope I got the points right):
>> 
>> http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l70/jmooreou/NewNSLSDN.jpg
>> 
>> -James
> IMPORTANT 1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses.
2.
> This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of this
email. 
> 3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not
>  a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated.
4.
> Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
> publications and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial
> electronic messages. 5. Please go to
> http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails of this
type
> from DVA. 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.
> 
> _______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list 
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu 
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
> 
> 

John K. Lerchey
Assistant Director for Incident Response
Information Security Office
Carnegie Mellon University

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l