Prev: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2) Next: Re: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 &2)

Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 &2)

From: Damo <damosan@g...>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:06:46 -0500
Subject: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 &2)


On Feb 26, 2007, at 5:31 PM, <Beth.Fulton@csiro.au>  
<Beth.Fulton@csiro.au> wrote:

>
>
> This seems to be a wider issue too. If you look at every major science
> fiction manufacturer on the web if they don't look like an "aliens"
> alien or a "predator" then they quietly disappear/dwindle while the
> human lines of the same system go on longer.
>

The 40k universe has examples of aliens which fit neither profile  
(neatly) and they tend to go onward (some better than others mind  
you).  Then again with the exception of one alien race they are  
physically close to human form (two arms, two legs, etc.).  Having  
said that I see your point though.

Damo

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2) Next: Re: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 &2)