Prev: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2) Next: Re: Re: [GZG] Re: ecc quotes

Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

From: "Allan Goodall" <agoodall@h...>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:38:01 -0600
Subject: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

On 2/21/07, Allan Goodall <agoodall@hyperbear.com> wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Roger Books <roger.books@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just my NSHO, but I don't think a SG3 is necessary, just the BDS
supplement.
> >  As far as I am concerned the big gap is FMA.  I'm running Snapshot
for that
> > scale.
>
> What has been called "SG3" on here is actually called something else
> by Jon. It will/could be a scale up from SG2, where you can do full
> company to full battalion actions. There _is_ a need for that scale.
>
> That having been said, yes, I would like to see FMAS released. It
> still requires some work, but the basics are there. I specifically
> joined the playtest list to test FMAS (at the time the only real
> version was FMC, a fantasy variant).
>
> I received three or four
> comments from people who playtested them within about six months of
> them being pused, but I've heard squat about them since.

pused? I meant "released", or maybe "posted".

-- 
Allan Goodall		 http://www.hyperbear.com
agoodall@hyperbear.com
awgoodall@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2) Next: Re: Re: [GZG] Re: ecc quotes