Prev: RE: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2) Next: Re: RE: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

From: "Roger Books" <roger.books@g...>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:15:37 -0500
Subject: Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lJust my NSHO, but I
don't think a SG3 is necessary, just the BDS
supplement.  As far as I am concerned the big gap is FMA.  I'm running
Snapshot for that scale.

Roger

On 2/21/07, McCarthy, Tom (xwave) <Tom.McCarthy@xwave.com> wrote:
>
>  Well, SG2 has been on the market since about '96 (give or take a year
or
> two) and it mentions BDS as forthcoming.
>
>
>
> Fleet Book playtesting by listers starts around GZG ECC 2 ('99), and
FMA
> playtesting and FB2 playtesting with GZG ECC 3 ('00), IIRC.  But FB2
is
> something like 5-6 years old.
>
>
>
> About 3 years ago I'd come to the unpopular conclusion that Jon needed
to
> let other people write FT3, DS3, SG3, FMA and BDS, then edit (or
revise to
> the point of co-authoring) so that they could be published before
2010.
> Instead, they remain irons in the fire along with fantasy variants and
> versions covering actions falling between SG2 and DS2 in size.
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:*
gzg-l-bounces+tom.mccarthy=xwave.com@lists.csua.berkeley.edu[mailto:
> gzg-l-bounces+tom.mccarthy=xwave.com@lists.csua.berkeley.edu] *On
Behalf
> Of *Roger Books
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 21, 2007 8:44 AM
> *To:* gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> *Subject:* Re: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR
(parts
> 1 & 2)
>
>
>
> I've said this before, but it can be repeated;
>
> Stop tweaking the rules to death and publish them.  I have talked to
> people
> that have told me they don't play GZG because it is dead as a
publisher of
> games.  How many years has it been since GZG published anything new?
>
> FMA and BDS were being discussed over 5 years ago when I discovered
> GZG.	IIRC it may well have been 7 years.
>
> Roger
>
>  On 2/20/07, *Allan Goodall *<agoodall@hyperbear.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/20/07, Jaime Tiampo <fugugaipan@spikyfishthing.com> wrote:
> > Speaking of FMA at EEC.. do we have rules some of us can look at for
it?
> > Something a little bit more refined then the Beta rules for like a
> decade
> > ago? ;-)
>
> Yes... if you're on the playtest list. *S*
>
> Allan
> --
> Allan Goodall 	   http://www.hyperbear.com
> agoodall@hyperbear.com
> awgoodall@gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>


Prev: RE: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2) Next: Re: RE: FMA at EEC: was Re: [GZG] Re: GZG ECC X: Indy's AAR (parts 1 & 2)