RE: Re: Re: [GZG] ping
From: "Hudak, Michael" <mihudak@s...>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:41:38 -0500
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [GZG] ping
Actually, I don't necessarily agree you've found any of that out, except
maybe for E.
You end up with some poor schmuck with a one shot surplus munition....
However hi-tech.
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> gzg-l-bounces+mihudak=state.pa.us@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> [mailto:gzg-l-bounces+mihudak=state.pa.us@lists.csua.berkeley.
> edu] On Behalf Of laserlight@verizon.net
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:09 PM
> To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] ping
>
> >> Good. We're happy to expend a drone just to find out the
> existence of the mines; getting to kill an expensive missile
> in the process is gravy.
> >
> >The remote sensor drone is essentially the equivalent of a
> 19th century
> >cavalry scout.
>
> A little more, in this scenario. We've found out:
>
> a. defenses are there
> b. defenses don't stop to identify before they shoot c. by
> implication, something worth defending is there d. defenses
> fire on low-mass, low-threat targets, implying an inability
> to discriminate e. type of weapon for some of the defenses,
> including thrust, warhead yield, possibly targeting ability
>
> All of this adds up to two things:
> a. we can sweep at least some of his mines by using balloons
> with sensor emitters; b. then we can sell him better equipment
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l