Prev: Re: [GZG] Point Systems Next: Re: [GZG] Point Systems

RE: Base Sizes (was Re: Re: [GZG] New game mechanics (was: Re:Namefor Rules))

From: "Robert W. Eldridge" <bob_eldridge@m...>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 07:51:52 -0500
Subject: RE: Base Sizes (was Re: Re: [GZG] New game mechanics (was: Re:Namefor Rules))

That's not true any more. The command distances have been increasd in
Flames
of War Version 2, and conscript infantry now can be up to 2" apart.

-----Original Message-----
From: gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
[mailto:gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of john tailby
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 1:06 AM
To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: Base Sizes (was Re: Re: [GZG] New game mechanics (was:
Re:Namefor Rules))

If you don't specify an approximate base size you might run into some 
problems with other area effect weapons.

In Flames of War, conscript (poor quality) infantry have to be touching
at 
least one other base to form a chain back to their platoon HQ to be in 
command. There are far more vulnerable to artillery templates than
veterans 
that can have 6" between stands.

Or if you are assaulting, every stand within 2" of the enemy gets to
fight 
so putting your units on a smaller base might gain you an advantage.

I also think that similar bases makes for a better looking game and more

recognisable units amongst those that play. 

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: [GZG] Point Systems Next: Re: [GZG] Point Systems