Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
From: Ken Bywaters <argentnova@y...>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:02:35 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lHi Jon,
1) Yes, both a and b. Have played extensively at reinforced company
level, mostly in 28mm but have used 15mm as well since you brought out
the figure packs. (We also routinely played DS2 at up to brigade level
- but then we did have a 12x6 foot table).
2) Yep, a - would be interested in 15mm. Would still be happy to
play 6mm for a Dirtside game, and the current SG2 level as well - and
I'm amongst the interested parties for FMAS too.
3) Both a and b. Have several 15mm forces already. A new rules set
and maybe a few more figure pack options might tempt me to expand my
current force levels.
Additional comments - as someone has already mentioned, SG2 is
structured towards an infantry game and doesn't handle vehicles as well
as it might. I've happily tweaked the rules a bit to fit specific
background where necessary (e.g. Hammer's Slammers), but the current SG2
rules aren't really ideal for combined arms or mechanised ops. I'd like
to see a set of rules that was pitched at this level and which allowed
me to use a reasonable armoured force on table with a fairly
fast-flowing rules set (but not as simplistic as the Hammer's Slammers
rules set). Using the table space to field a decent number of vehicles
as well as infantry seems like a good reason to switch to 15mm as far as
I'm concerned.
Cheers,
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: Ground Zero Games
Date: Thursday, November 2, 2006 12:28 pm
Subject:
To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> 1) Do you (or have you in recent years) play SG2?
> a) Yes, with 25/28mm minis
> b) Yes, with 15mm minis but using standard SG2 - ie: single-
> based figures
> c) Yes, with 15mm minis but modified for group-based figures
> d) No, interested but have no opponents/time/money etc...
> e) No, not interested
>
> 2) Would the development of a game like we've been discussing
> (let's
> call it SG3) fit what you would want from a hard SF ground
> combat
> game?
> a) Yes, and I'd play it in 15mm
> b) Yes, but I'd still play it in 25/28mm (or 6mm, or anything else!)
> c) No, this level of game doesn't interest me
>
> 3) Would the development of SG3 in this direction tempt you into
> buying/collecting 15mm forces?
> a) Yes, I'd buy a new 15mm army!
> b) I already have a 15mm force waiting for a game system...
> c) No, I've got enough lead/scale/projects already!
>
> For all questions, feel free to add an "other" option (and
> discuss...) if none of those supplied really fits!
>
> Over to you all....
>
> Jon (GZG)
---------------------------------
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity
and ease of use." - PC Magazine