Prev: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted) Next: [GZG] Re: Blue Sky Thinking

Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:38:51 -0600
Subject: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)

Agreed, just co-op'ting others. And, I like the press. ;->=

Well, some, of late....

The_Beast

Chris wrote on 11/03/2006 10:29:23 AM:

> >Course, G-Cav 2 is fine, and you can put fluff like 'The
> popular press seems to think it cool to shorten it to Grav Cav
>
> I suggested Grav Cav because (IMO) "Grav" is more readily
> identifiable as a science fiction element than "G"; and
> because it's analogous with the existing usage Air Cav.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted) Next: [GZG] Re: Blue Sky Thinking