Prev: RE: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted) Next: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:25:46 -0600
Subject: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)

S-AC works, tho' expect derogatory 'sack of...' comments; G-Cav 2 works
for
me, but I'd probably call it Grav Cavalry over Grav Cav, and use the
short
version in the text.

The_Beast

Chris wrote on 11/03/2006 07:21:46 AM:

> >Something like "STARGRUNT - ASSAULT COMPANY"
>
> That'd work for me. Building on existing name recognition.
>
> >or even G-CAV 2
>
> Perhaps "Grav Cav" would be a little more clear than G-Cav?

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: RE: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted) Next: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re: Wanted)