Prev: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???). Next: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).

RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).

From: "Michael Brown" <mwsaber6@m...>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:16:10 -0600
Subject: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).

I think that was an "enhancement" that was done for the web site (can't
remember whose).  I think the intent was to mix things up a little more
giving both side the possibility of using Attacker missions and forces

 
 
 
Michael Brown
mwsaber6@msn.com
 
-----Original Message-----
From: gzg-l-bounces+mwsaber6=msn.com@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
[mailto:gzg-l-bounces+mwsaber6=msn.com@lists.csua.berkeley.edu] On
Behalf Of
Doug Evans
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 6:53 AM
To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full
Thrust???).

Michael: I just remembered when looking back at my copy. D13 ends with
'Select another Attack Mission Card.' Typo, right?

The_Beast

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
Prev: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???). Next: RE: [GZG] [FT] Belt Wars (Was: Seastrike scenarios to Full Thrust???).