Re: [GZG] re: New to Rules- Close Combat Question
From: Mark Kinsey <Kinseym@p...>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 19:37:01 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] re: New to Rules- Close Combat Question
Glenn M. Goffin wrote:
>> Posted by: "hundvighong" email@example.com hundvighong
>> Going to close quarters ought to be something you do only when you
>> absolutely, positively have to take that ground right away...and
>> even then, it shouldn't be a sure thing.
> Close combat seems to work best you have power armor and they don't,
> and when you have flamers and shotguns and they don't.
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> Gzg-l mailing list
I'm running a scenario where it's important for the attacker to do
things quickly. The attacker has PA and the defender does not. Plus the
attacker has better quality troops. It's hard to convince the attacking
player that closing the distance and getting into close combat is much
more effective for him than sitting at distance and trying to get hits
on defenders in hard cover.
Gzg-l mailing list