Prev: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval? Next: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?

Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?

From: "Damond Walker" <damosan@g...>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:54:33 -0400
Subject: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?

On 8/16/06, Doug Evans <devans@nebraska.edu> wrote:

> Aside from the occasional suicide small craft, do the ranges suggested
for
> most 'modern' battles negate the fiddly maneuvering FT2 would model?
DS2
> might just do the job then. Not that I'm anyone to speak to that.

Fiddly maneuvering has it's place in modern naval battles.  Though the
only real purpose of such fiddly movement would be to unmask your
batteries to shoot down incoming missles.
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

Prev: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval? Next: Re: Re: Re: [GZG] [FT] Modern Naval?