[GZG] [FT] Re missile threads
From: "Matthew Tope" <kirov76@g...>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:03:16 +0100
Subject: [GZG] [FT] Re missile threads
Gzg-l mailing list
I have found the missile discussions of late most interesting and I have
idea to throw into the melting pot. Probably not an overly good idea for
reason's my tiny little mind won't detect until they are pointed out,
what the hey!
Personally my (and my groups) chief problem with missiles (by which I am
referring to SM's, HM's, and AMT's) is getting them any where near a
possible target. This is not so much that we are bad shots, it's just
result of playing the game whereby 1 mu is 1 cm, and the average speed
thrust 4 vessel is 24, and a thrust 6 vessel is 36, or there abouts.
If we get the darn things on target we are all happy with the
between them and defensive fire as per Beta Test Rules discussed else
However we would like them to be a little more "guided".
Now, given my groups particular problem here is a possible approach to
1) Missile launch phase: Upon missile launch the missile is moved
forward from the launching vessel along the bearing said vessel is
distance equal to the launching vessels velocity at the end of the
2) After vessel movement, but before fighter secondary movement: All
missiles may move 0 to full allowed movement distance in any direction.
are of course moving from the position they occupied following their
Missile attacks etc are then resolved as normal.
In a very simplistic manner this approximates vector style movement
to confuse matters further it is intended for cinematic games). The
launching platforms own velocity restricts somewhat the engagement
of the missile, whilst at the same time increasing throw distance. A
ship, say moving at 30, could lob a salvo effectively out to a range of
however the section of "Guided" movement, the secondary move of 24 mu,
insufficient for the missile to turn and engage a target which following
vessel movement ended up behind the missiles launch position. Or in
words, fast ships get to launch their missiles further but sacrificing
agility, slow moving vessels get more flexibility as to where their
end up, but sacrifice range.
Hope that all made sense...if not ignore the above paragraph and just
re-read steps 1) and 2)...if it still doesn't make sense, then worry
Salvo missiles still retain their 6mu lock on zone. However a 3 arc
would be redundant, as the missiles can only be launched directly
Knocking the launch tubes down to 1 arc and 2 mass should resolve this
AMT's still get the 6 mu follow up move immediately after moving in step
though, of course, they still home in on the nearest vessel which may or
not be the preferred target.
HM's will require record keeping, their base velocity for step 1 of
subsequent turns being equal to the distance between their launch point
step one, and the end point of their move at the end of step 2. This
course require numerous chits and measurements which will of course slow
game down, thus a simpler solution may well be preferable. In fact I
it would be...
So, to conclude, this idea works best for SM's and AMT's. It can
boost the missiles range, give the firing player more control, whilst
giving the flavour of the placed marker system, that of the firing
having to guess, via the launch step, only transferring the onus onto
launching vessel to maneuver to the right spot, and at the correct
to achieve an accurate volley. Without the need for additional paper
Except in the case of HM's. Ignore the latter for now. Please.
Note the lack of PSB. As pointed out in earlier discussions PSB/Real
examples can be argued back and forth. Therefore consider all PSB to
been mutually annihilated.
Any hoo, there it is,