Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:23:27 -0500
Subject: Re: [FT] Alternate Tuffleyverse interpretations (Long?) was Re: [GZG] [FT] NAC campaign setup
Chris wrote on 04/14/2006 11:45:18 AM:
***snippage of the appreciated supportive part***
> >> >"the OU claims all the useless M type stars"
> >> > They *all* get visited by OU patrol vessels
> >> Nightvision class fast recon corvettes, often with
> >> "Imperial University Astronomical Survey" painted on the side.
> >Not to mention licensed, private prospectors and their suppliers
> "Licensed"? <quick flip through translation program>
> In the AE, you can get trained, independently inspected,
> audited, bonded, but I don't think you can get licensed...
> You mean you're going to *pay* someone to tell you that
> you can do something?
Whoops, sorry I was confusing by including your part of the post; or,
you saying OU couldn't have such a licensing structure? AE is an
to OU? I sure have missed much.
Or, I erred in assuming "Amazing number of former OU naval personnel
sprinkled among the crews, no?" would restrict of whom I was speaking. I
should think even former OU naval personnel would cover their past on
ships of other nations. Especially, if they are doing the observational
duties my part implied.
As I've proven in the recent past, what I'm saying isn't always what I
Gzg-l mailing list