Re: [GZG] DSIII q

Grant,

We've been discussing the "impact marker" issue.  As OA has pointed out
to 
me again and again, there shouldn't BE an impact marker that the enemy
can 
see.  Sadly, because it's a game, and there has to be some way to track 
such things, we have to put something down.  There are ways to move the 
marker once it's played.  If it's being painted by an FO (guy with a
laser 
or whatever), that player can move it around on his TCR within certain 
limits (that I don't want to go look up right now!).  Some munitions are

self correcting and will look for signatures within an area and fire off

at them.

I hadn't considered things like orbital lasers, but don't see any reason

that such could not be used if your setting allowed for it.  I'll defer 
that to OA.

There is currently a TON of stuff in the artillery section, which is
part 
of why I have been ignoring it until I'm much more comfortable with the 
main rules. :)	The infantry mortars would have been useless against 
vehicles and useful against infantry or other soft targets. :)

John

John K. Lerchey
Assistant Director for Incident Response
Information Security Office
Carnegie Mellon University

On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Grant A. Ladue wrote:

>
>  Hi all,
>
>    Are there any provisions for "smart" or "brilliant" munitions,
loitering
>  weapons, and orbital weapons (Thor and the like)?  Given the sci-fi
setting
>  of the game, I'd like to see artillery that was a bit less like
Vietnam era
>  weapons unless the mechanics are just to unwieldy.  How about orbital
to
>  ground energy weapons?
>    I would think that with smart artillery rounds, there wouldn't be
an impact
>  point to warn the other guys before arrival.  If they're necessary,
are they
>  reasonably maneuverable?  Either way, perhaps the artillery side
should be
>  able to place "dummies" that keep the other side guessing as to where
the
>  actual artillery will land?
>
>    I imagine you haven't worked a lot of it out yet, so many of the
questions
>  may not have answers yet.  I'm just as curious as heck about this
part of it.
>
>    Hmm, as I re-read your response below, I'm realizing that you only
meant
>  that the infantry mortars were basically useless against armor.  At
least, I
>  hope that's what you meant.	:-)
>
>
>  grant
>
>>
>> Well, since you asked.  I can give you the basics, and will leave out
>> the myriad of guidance systems and such.
>>
>> The artillery can be called in as part of an active firefight, or an
FO
>> can start a firefight by calling in artillery.  (I'll get some of
this a
>> little wrong as the artillery section is not fully worked out). The
FO
>> places an impact marker, just as per DSII.  If the artillery is on
>> table, it comes in on the following TCR - allowing the targets to
>> attempt to flee the beaten zone.  Note that with correctable
munitions,
>> and with infantry only moving at 0.5mu Combat Move, they won't always
>> get out. :)	If the artillery is off table, it's put into a "zone";
each
>> zone requiring a full TCR for the rounds to pass through.  So, if you
>> have a battery in zone 3, and place an impact marker on TCR 2, the
>> impact occurs on TCR 5.  Not terribly useful unless you're targeting
a
>> position (hill, revetment, etc.) or have the enemy well pinned and
>> unable to move.
>>
>> The damage is figured depending on what kind of munitions you used.
>> Since the artillery is designed as a normal non-energy weapon with a
>> high elevation weapon mount, and ARTY-FCS, it can fire whatever kinds
of
>> rounds the normal gun does. So MDCs lay in MDC fire.  HVCs can fire
KE,
>> HEAT, HE, Shrapnel, etc.  The infantry mortars that the Order had in
the
>> game were LVC/0.5s (low velocity cannon).  Pretty much useless
against
>> armor (rolling impact die * 0.5 even against top armor is asking a
>> lot!), and they only had HE, Shrapnel, and smoke.  So their best shot
>> against your tanks would have gotten them a D6/2 for impact.
>>
>> Against infantry, however, especially if they can catch them out in
the
>> open, it's a different story. :)
>>
>> That's the basics.  A lot of work (potentially) goes into the design
of
>> your ammo loads, but once you're playing, it's not that hard to
resolve. :)
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> Grant A. Ladue wrote:
>>>> Grant,
>>>>
>>>    I have to admit that I've very curious as to how the artillery
blends into
>>>  firefights.
>>>
>>>   grant
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gzg-l mailing list
>>> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>>> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gzg-l mailing list
>> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l