Prev: Re: [GZG] Primers Next: Re: [GZG] DSIII q

Re: [GZG] NAC - American style - new ships

From: "John Brewer" <jbrewer@w...>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:32:32 GMT
Subject: Re: [GZG] NAC - American style - new ships

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lFor Kent Bywaters, 

Yeah, sorry.  It's just that in my original "NAC - American style", I
already had an escort cruiser called the Norfolk & I felt it best to
avoid confusion.  That's why I have a battleship Quebec & a cruiser cite
du Quebec.  Same goes for Mexico, Guatemala, & Panama.	

And while we're on the subject, rememering the controversy involving the
naming of a submarine "City of Corpus Cristi", the name of one of my
light escort cruisers should have been either "City of Corpus Cristi" or
"Ciudad de Corpus Cristi", depending on which language the majority of
the citizens of Corpus Cristi will be speaking in 2183.  

JBrewer@webtv.net  

"Always strive to be a good person.  If you can't do that, at least
strive to be someone other than an asshole."  

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Bywaters
Sent: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 13:35:35 -0800
To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [GZG] NAC - American style - new ships



For John Brewer....
   
  John,
   
  Just a brief comment on your class names, from a dweller across the
pond...
   
  If the Thunderer class battleship names are based upon contemporary
British counties, then the following should drop the "shire" part of the
name:
   
  NORFOLK, SUFFOLK, SUSSEX, DURHAM, KENT.
   
  You could also add HERTFORDSHIRE.
   
  We're not great ones for consistency and continuity in naming systems
over here! 
   
  Best,
  Ken


		
---------------------------------
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new
Yahoo! Security Centre.


Prev: Re: [GZG] Primers Next: Re: [GZG] DSIII q