Prev: Re: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world Next: RE: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world

Re: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world

From: Carlos Lourenco <loscon@g...>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:56:14 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lThis is where one
starts getting into issues with trying to equate early
20th century ship nomenclature to out in the future. Perhaps instead of
looking at it from a 20th century perspective look at what functions
ship
have in the FT universe and work back form there?

IE line of battle, escort, support, carrier, independent patrol...

How much of anything has been gone over in the books regaring individual
or
fleet sustainability in the long term? (Hmm time for a FT campaign
book?)
Namely cruise duration between replenishments for fuel, stores, wepaons
etc.

Los


Prev: Re: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world Next: RE: [GZG] Cruisers and Destroyers in the FT world