Re: [GZG] [Stargrunt]

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lSo is there any
hope for an SG3 with a better morale system?

Roger

On 1/4/06, Allan Goodall <agoodall@hyperbear.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/4/06, gzg-l-request@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> <gzg-l-request@lists.csua.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:46:32 -0600
> > From: "David Rodemaker" <dar@horusinc.com>
> > Subject: RE: [GZG] [Stargrunt]
>
> > I've played it with anything from fire-teams to company sized
> engagements, a
> > couple of platoons on each side seems to work best.
>
> Unfortunately, as Beth has pointed out in the past, the SG2 Confidence
> Test system works best with only 1 platoon per side. Otherwise it's
> not nasty enough.
>
> Two platoons per side works best, but this is kind of an odd size:
> bigger than a platoon, but not a full company. It's probably my
> biggest (of several) complaints I have about SG2.
>
> --
> Allan Goodall 	   http://www.hyperbear.com
> agoodall@hyperbear.com
> awgoodall@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>