RE: [GZG] [SG] IAVRs

You got the general idea, anyway.

I've played way too many wargames where dead vehicles providing cover
means
the difference between winning and losing.  Of course I've also stopped
playing those games as the rules are even more munchkin than they used
to
be.

Brendan
'Neath Southern Skies

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Behalf Of Adrian
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 12:46 PM
> To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
> Subject: RE: [GZG] [SG] IAVRs
> 
> <with tongue in cheek> This reminded me of the scene in Ronin 
> when Sean 
> Bean's character outlines his plan for an ambush, and gets 
> cut to shreds by 
> Robert DeNero's character...
> 
> Personally, I'd *not* put ambushing squads on both sides of the road.
> 
> Having said that, deployment is very dependent on the 
> terrain.  It might 
> well not be a problem, and in a game, of course, you don't 
> worry about 
> friendly fire since that doesn't happen without a lot of GM 
> intervention...

IMPORTANT 
1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information 
   for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, 
   please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not 
   a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 
4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous
publications 
   and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic
messages. 
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails

   of this type from DVA. 
6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.  

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l