Prev: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault Next: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

From: Warbeads@a...
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:16:18 EST
Subject: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l 
 
In a message dated 11/29/05 8:45:28 AM Central Standard Time,  
roger@firedrake.org writes:

On Tue,  Nov 29, 2005 at 06:28:05AM -0800, laserlight wrote:

>"Motorized  tank" doesn't make sense; perhaps "motorized
>armored platoon" is what  they meant.

As with the Royal Navy's term "Warfare Officer", even  though one knows
the reason for the specific use of language one does still  tend to
wonder what a non-motorised armoured platoon would look  like.

R
_______________________________________________
<snip>

Pill boxes?
 
Gracias,

Glenn  "warbeads"


Prev: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault Next: Re: [GZG] Small thought re: Orbital Assault