Re: [GZG] More beta ships
From: Inire <inire@y...>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [GZG] More beta ships
I'm still struck by the lightness of these ships: in
the era of KVs and even prototypical UNSC (not to
mention the beams galore from the NSL) the IJSF that
I've playtested haven't survived even a brush with
other ships.
furthermore, the SMPs seem entirely close-in weapons,
useless when the ship is so much shiny chaff long
before SMPs can get range.
are the IJSF in playtest _just_ about getting big
carrier and fighter groups out and the rest of the
ships hang waaay back?
colour me confused....
--- Roger Burton West <roger@firedrake.org> wrote:
> These designs are a thoroughly unofficial test of
> one set of stats for
> the IJSF. If possible, they're even less official
> than the UNSC and ORC
> previews already posted - while it's very likely
> that grasers and EMP
> beams will survive in a form substantially similar
> to their present one,
> the Hyperspatial Distortion Cannon may well change
> completely.
>
> Anyway, for what it's worth:
>
> http://ijsf.firedrake.org/
>
> Roger
> _______________________________________________
> Gzg-l mailing list
> Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
>
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
>
Jeff "My dice hate me!" Fearnow
Gaming to keep War out of RealTime!
"'DESTROY THE WITNESSES!!. Chaffing aside, I have no answer: I Excrete
Sour Cream!" www.wigu.com, 29 Jan 2003
XT350/DOD#1890
AND don't forget: Serenity releases 30 September!
Trailer at apple.com!!!
http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/serenity/trailer_2/index.html
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l